Friday 22 March 2019

Can God* forgive us for what we have done to this world?


Can God* forgive us for what we have done to this world?


*by ‘God’ I mean your version of the non-human force/energy/consciousness/etc. that is existence

This morning I was researching for a presentation that my wife [a mental health Nurse] & I will do at the Canadian Mental Health Nursing Conference in October on Ecological Grief and across, by accident, a reference to the movie  First Reformed (2017) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6053438/. In it an “eco-terrorist pastor” runs amok when he is overwhelmed by what he learns about climate change. It’s about a pastor who loses his son and his wife, suffers from alcoholism and oversees a dying church while the ethically-questionable megachurch prospers next door. The pastor is not just seeing tragedy in the world on both personal and global levels, he’s seeing a church [eg. society] complicit in it. https://relevantmagazine.com/culture/is-first-reformed-the-best-faith-movie-ever-or-pure-blasphemy/
The movie revolves around this question asked by the Pastor:
Can God forgive us for what we have done to this world?


He is just as unsure of the answer as I am. Personally, given Newton’s Third Law informs us that:
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction
and given this wisdom from the Bible [Galatians]:
 Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.
- I doubt it.
We are living in the age of consequence. Just as it takes longer to heal from an injury than the time it took to get injured, just as it takes longer to clean up the mess in the kitchen than the time it took to make the mess, I imagine that it will take a very long time for the Earth to clean up the mess created by our worship of exponential growth in consumption and population at all cost.  I use the term worship deliberately for its religious over-tones. It seems that humans need a god to worship: whether it be a grove of trees or Zeus or Buddha or the economy it is all comes down to the same thing – we search for some higher purpose to give meaning to our brief and otherwise meaningless lives. It just so happens that our current god is killing us.


We are like the Aztecs. Their god of war and sacrifice, Huitzilopochtli, demanded continuous human sacrifice. To find new victims they had to, for religious reason, fight never ending wars by conquering new peoples who, of course, both hated and feared them. All went well for the Aztecs until the Spanish turned up – those gods predicted in their myths and thus unassailable. With the help of the surrounding Native tribes and disease [typhoid] the Aztecs were conquered – just as we will be conquered for worshipping a false god – the god of growth, growth, growth. The god that has turned us into the cancer of the Earth.

All I can say to the future is SORRY [watch video if desired]


Of course, we could, as suggested in the video above, change our ways. We are, I hope, a bit smarter than the Aztecs, a bit smarter than cancer cells, a bit smarter than yeast in a batch of fermenting beer who increase in population until the alcohol they secrete kills them. We are smarter, only, we seem not to have found a way to use that intelligence at a societal level. Our politics has failed us, because we are blinded by our god, our god of population and economic growth at all costs. So, to avoid the fate of the Aztecs and of cancer cells we must change, we must worship another god. We must find another politics that can organize us for survival. Or die. Die in the flames of a hell of our creation, as painted for us by H.Bosch in 1500.

However, Bosch does not have the last word. I leave you with this poem by Mary Oliver a classic New England nature poet who died this past January, where she explores despair.
Wild Geese
You do not have to be good.
You do not have to walk on your knees for a hundred miles through the desert repenting.
You only have to let the soft animal of your body love what it loves.
Tell me about despair, yours, and I will tell you mine.
 Meanwhile the world goes on.
Meanwhile the sun and the clear pebbles of the rain are moving across the landscapes,
over the prairies and the deep trees, the mountains and the rivers.
Meanwhile the wild geese, high in the clean blue air, are heading home again.
Whoever you are, no matter how lonely, the world offers itself to your imagination,
calls to you like the wild geese, harsh and exciting
-- over and over announcing your place in the family of things.


Monday 18 March 2019

Worldwide Climate Student Strike March 15


Worldwide Climate Student Strike March 15
Inspired by Greta Thunberg, who has now been nominated for the Nobel prize, there were student strikes across the world protesting inaction on climate change by us – those adults. Inaction does not mean blaming the governments, or those evil ‘global corporations’ Greta points to ALL adults who have done [next to] nothing to combat climate change, and thus probably make her life very, very challenging.
This strike is not just about kids missing schools – to think that way would be to miss the point. It is, I hope, another giant push to get people to stop behaving like ostriches who have their head stuck in the sand and face, as bravely as Greta has done [when she did so it gave her the equivalent of a nervous breakdown]. Remember, students have no power except the ability to be heard. This is what she says are the reasons for the strike:                Why are kids striking?
School children are required to attend school. But with the worsening Climate Destruction this goal of going to school begins to be pointless.
- Why study for a future, which may not be there?
- Why spend a lot of effort to become educated, when our governments are not listening to the educated?
Here is a map showing where strikes happened around the world today – everywhere!

In Ottawa several thousand youth, some young children with their parents, but mostly University aged youth, tried to make their voices heard with this message:
DO SOMETHING NOW !!!
Here is a picture from Ottawa to give you a flavour for the event. I was there with my wife and CACOR member Ian Whyte also attended.


 

Not only did CACOR have members attend this event, we also, for the first time in years, posted a press release: here is an excerpt from it.

The Association today supported a statement by the International Club of Rome with regard to supporting the concerns of students around the world and the crisis of climate change which their actions emphasize.  The statement includes the following quotation:


 “ To avoid the worst outcomes, global carbon emissions must be cut by half by 2030 and to zero by 2050. For the wealthier nations, this increases to around 80% by 2030, with full de-carbonisation less than a decade later. This is an unprecedented task, requiring a reduction rate of at least 7% annually; no country has to date achieved more than 1.5%”  { Please read the full statement attached to this release above.}
 The Canadian Association is presently undertaking a major project of modelling the bio-physical and infrastructural changes for Canada to explore if and what Pathways for Canada are possible to actually meet existing Paris climate change goals and then to reduce emissions by 80% by 2050.  This report will utilize the most comprehensive data bases available and for the first time at the pan-Canadian level will point to both a methodology which ensures targets are actually met if proper implementation occurs across all identified Pathways. The initial report is expected to be released by May 22, 2019

Clearly the time for study is over. Greta is right, we must ALL – every single one of us – change how we live personally and exert whatever political pressure we can to get our governments and corporations change in many ways – the most obvious transforming to a net zero carbon economy by 2050. I wish humanity good luck, knowing that while we are capable of this goal, it takes a bit of ‘waking up to smell the roses’ and face uncomfortable reality that our current way of life, like that of the dinosaurs, is over. For details about these student strikes see Fridaysforfuture.org 








Saturday 9 March 2019

Stop Flying


Stop Flying


Why?    
 It’s the Best Way to Get your Neighbour’s Attention that you are Serious about Climate Change! He or she will think you have lost your marbles. That could be good, or bad… And why is that?

First, Credibility. Your neighbour recognizes that giving up flying is a big deal, it is a huge sacrifice [to most people], so it means that you are serious, deadly serious, about the dangers of climate change. As a IPCC climate science writer said: “As an average person that follows this issue and write about it a lot for his job, if I don’t do something that the IPCC recommends, why would anyone else?”            [Science writer and meteorologist Eric Holthaus,2013]

Second, nothing that we do pumps carbon dioxide into the atmosphere faster than air travel. Cancel a couple longish flights, and you can halve your carbon footprint. 


Third, tourism is now one of the world’s largest industries: The World Travel and Tourism Council in its 2017 assessment found that travel and tourism accounted for 10.1% of global GDP, and growing. For the seventh consecutive year, the Travel & Tourism sector has outperformed the global economy, which grew at 3% during 2017,  while  being the fastest growing broad economic sector globally, outperforming the likes of manufacturing, retail and wholesale, agriculture, forestry and fisheries, and financial services. https://www.hotelmanagement.com.au/2018/03/28/26043/  Most people think this is good news, but I am not among them. Did you know that in 2017, at any given time, there were 1,270,406 people in the air flying? The International Civil Aviation Organization estimated there were 3.5 billion (yes BILLION) plane passengers in 2015!

Fourth, yes, I know that the CO2 from jets “only” account of 2% of the GHGs [by comparison, meat production accounts for 14.5 per cent of the world's total GHGs]¸ however its impacts, in the short term, are actually much higher as explained here:

The wrinkle, always vaguely understood by climate geeks but finally explored in depth in a recent scientific paper, is that the relative impact of different types of travel depends not just on practical factors such as engine efficiency and occupancy rates, but also on something altogether more abstract: the time frame you care about. The reason this is so crucial is that the effects of different greenhouse gases play out in the atmosphere at a different speeds. CO2, released by all fuel-burning vehicles, can remain in the air for centuries, causing a gentle warming effect. By contrast, most other gases and impacts – such as the vapour trails and tropospheric ozone produced by planes at altitude – cause much more potent but shorter-lived bursts of warming. If you'll forgive an extension to the "frying the planet" metaphor, generating global warming with CO2 is equivalent to slow-cooking the earth in a cast-iron skillet, whereas cooking the planet with vapour trails would be more like flash-frying it in an extra-hot wok.
In order to tot up these differently paced warming impacts into a single carbon footprint number for a flight or any other activity, it's necessary to decide what time frame you're talking about. Conventional wisdom is to add up the total warming impact of all the different greenhouse gases over the period of a century to create a nice, round but ultimately arbitrary number. If, by contrast, we shifted the focus to a much shorter time period – which arguably would make more sense, given that the next decade or so could turn out to be make-or-break in terms of avoiding climate tipping points – then the impact of vapour trails and other short-lived impacts look massively more significant. At risk of over-stretching the frying-pans analogy, the flash-fry wok may be more likely to cause a disastrous kitchen fire than the slow-cook skillet, even if they both use the same amount of heat overall.
The new paper, published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, finally pins some numbers on all this theory by examining the impact over different time periods of various different modes of transport. The results are illuminating. According to the paper, if we focus just on the impact over the next five years, then planes currently account for more global warming than all the cars on the world's roads – a stark reversal of the usual comparison. Per passenger mile, things are even more marked: flying turns out to be on average 50 times worse than driving in terms of a five-year warming impact.  

So if you are not yet convinced that this is actually the easiest [as most flights are optional] tool in your toolkit to combat global warming how about crunching the numbers? Use this online calculator to figure out your carbon footprint for your next flight: https://co2.myclimate.org/en/flight_calculators/new Here’s a simple way to put the numbers in perspective: a flight from Los Angeles to Casablanca (with a layover in Paris) emits about 8,400 pounds of carbon dioxide, while the average meat loving American generates about 1,300 pounds of carbon dioxide a year through eating beef. If you think I am ‘extreme’ try reading this angry rant: http://hot-topic.co.nz/what-are-we-waiting-for-the-fantasy-of-carbon-neutral-growth-of-aviation-emissions/#more-15250
Finally, as an armchair philosopher, I think a major problem is that most people still think the grass is greener on the other side. Or perhaps they just are not content. Or they are bored. Or perhaps they are just fundamentally unhappy and believe that a change of scenery will do the trick. I for one am content and grateful to live in Canada, where so many people are desperate to emigrate to, and if it snows a bit, so be it.
Next Week: Alternatives to Flying


p.s. Yes, I have stopped flying, my last flight was in 2000.

Sunday 3 March 2019

(Why) the 21st Century is When Humanity Matures — or Falls Apart

(Why) the 21st Century is When Humanity Matures — or Falls Apart

The Lessons a Troubled Age is Trying to Teach Us

Here’s a tiny question: why is Jeff Bezos “worth” more than the…entire actual Amazon River?
If the world feels troubled to you these days, there’s a deeper meaning in the message that we’ve scarcely had time to consider — let alone let alone fully understand.The 21st century is going to be humanity’s most significant, epic decade of transformation yet — by a very long way. One that will make the industrial revolution, or the age of revolutions before it, look tiny and insignificant. The changes that we have to make this century are so big, so fundamental, and so radical — we barely imagine them at all.
Every adolescence is turbulent, dramatic, and intense. This century is going to be the time humanity grows up — or falls apart. That transformation can go one of two ways. Down — into the abyss of violence, ignorance, war, and ruin. Or up — into a new era, a new phase of progress, a new chapter in humanity’s story. We may emerge wiser. Matured and sophisticated as a species, into higher, truer, more powerful forms of freedom, justice, truth, meaning, and purpose.
So far, we’re not making the good transition — the upwards one, to a higher place. We are making the bad one. We are plunging backwards and downwards by the month. That is because we still don’t understand the message of the 21st century whatsoever really, so let me spell it out — in terms of three transitions, transformations, radical and necessary changes.

The first transition is what you might call one of political economy. We are going to have to stop being exploitative, abusive, harmful, toxic — to ourselves, each other, the planet, democracy, the future: in general, as an attitude, a way of being, an approach — a paradigm. We are going to have start being genuinely constructive. Positive, beneficial, giving-back, gentle, wise. The reason is very simple.
We are out of things to exploit now, except the very last dregs, and the most toxic and poisonous things of all. The oceans are full of plastic and the skies full of carbon. The only thing left to exploit is each other. That is what capitalism tells us to do — but the problem is that if we exploit each other, no progress is possible at all. Exploited peoples turn on their systems, become fascists, try to annihilate those below them, go delusionally insane, and end up viciously destroying their societies, to put it bluntly. You can see that story played out in America’s grotesque, bizarre downfall. So we cannot go on with the exploitative mindset that capitalism and supremacy and patriarchy have drilled into us for so long now — unless, that is, we wish to end up like America, ruled by a madman at the precise moment of collapse, while the finely robed leaders, like Rome’s Senate, gnash their teeth and wail.
The world is out of fresh, unused resources with which to feed us, nurture us, nourish us — and unless we get what that actually means, we are in for a nasty surprise. What it means is that we are going to have to learn to make much more from much less — I’ll come to that in a moment — or turn on each other, and start taking things from our neighbours. Those are the only two options, my friends: do more with less, or take from each other.
If we don’t change, if we go on pretending we can go on using the exploitative paradigm, we will end up like Americans have done, made to take things from each other, because there isn’t enough to go around, since we’re out of things to exploit. Hence, Americans have to “compete” for perpetually scarce healthcare, jobs, retirement, and so on, never understanding these are things they should have given one another — America’s the dystopia at the end of the road of using an exploitative paradigm in a world that’s out of things to exploit. All that happens is that you end up feeding your own kids, country, and future into the grinder. Which future do we want? Which future is compatible with democracy, freedom, and justice?
But we’re not going to be able to rely on the institutions of the exploitative paradigm to change it for us. We aren’t going to be able to rely on giant mega-corporations to build a better world, democracy, or future for us. Why would they care? We aren’t going to be able to rely on hedge funds, banks, companies, or anything else, in fact. We are going to have to reimagine and reinvent the ways that we do things collectively, in non-exploitative forms. We don’t have many such forms yet — maybe any. The ones we do have reward the most exploitative among us the most, don’t they? How else do we get President Trump and Harvey Weinstein and neo-Nazis fawningly profiled in the NYT? Perhaps you see what I mean.
That we don’t have non-explorative anything is why the globe’s indicators — from inequality to fascism to carbon — are all blinking red simultaneously. So we’re going to have to reinvent everything from “jobs” to “work” to “corporations” to “markets” to “banks” to “investment” to “management” to “democracy” — just to get started making the first transition.
The transition away from cultures, systems, and institutions of exploitation isn’t going to be easy. There are many among us who love and cherish exploitation — because we have been told it’s right and just and fair. Such people will lash out, probably in great eruptions of violence — to try to stop progress from happening. That is precisely what, for example, Anders Breivik did when he massacred dozens of children on Utoya. Fascism will continue to rise in societies that don’t understand the 21st century’s first challenge is rejecting exploitation, in all its forms (and America’s future looks particularly bleak in that regard, my friends.)
But how are we to reject exploitation, and begin the project of being constructive — which means something like nourishing, transforming, cultivating? With a mindset, an attitude, a paradigm, of true equality. True equality doesn’t mean the nonsense Americans are fed — “all people, created equal”, while billionaires cruise around in megayachts, while 40% of American kids live in some form of poverty.
Why is Jeff Bezos more “valuable” than the…actual Amazon river? Does that make any sense to you? It doesn’t to me.
True equality means that there shouldn’t be billionaires while a single child lives in poverty. While a single river runs dry. While a single cloud is full of soot. While a single ocean tide washes up filled with garbage. Do you see my point a little bit? It means that you and I must regard everyone as our equal — and everything, too. River, mountains, trees, clouds. These things aren’t there for us to abuse, my friends — any more than your kids or mine are there for plutocrats and tyrants to reign over, any more than Jeff Bezos is really “worth” more than the Amazon River, in the eyes of history, reason, sanity, or humanity.
True equality begins with the idea that every human being deserves basic things — education, healthcare, retirement, childcare, and so on. We’ve done a terrible job as a globe of organizing this. In the rich West, some societies have these things — while, generally, 90% of humanity doesn’t. Meanwhile, a handful of people own half the globe’s wealth. Do you see the problem with all this? The global economy is going to have to be redesigned so that poor kids in Laos and Burundi can have educations and healthcare before another dude named Travis or Steve becomes a billionaire for no good reason.
That’s not because I say so. But because, like I said, we are going to have to reject exploitation, abuse, and violence as the ordering principle of our lives, societies, systems, institutions. Yet that doesn’t mean what American liberals think it does — go do some yoga, write a nice Facebook post, and be mean to Donald Trump on Twitter. It means genuinely redesigning a global economy that puts the needs of the most vulnerable first, and far above and beyond those of billionaires, speculators, and tycoons.
This transformation means genuine and dramatic change — like a global healthcare system, or a global education system, a global system of savings and incomes, and so forth. Especially before you or I care one whit if some idiot billionaire announces he’s going to Mars. When I put it that way, do you see how immature we are a species — and how tiny and limited our vision has been so far?
That brings to my third transition. We are going to have to develop a species level morality for the first time in our history — and then go beyond it. So far, human morality consists of something like the following. I should care about my family, tribe, and nation, in roughly that order — and I’ll kill anyone they ask me to. Or anything. I’ll drain any river, blow up any mountain, char any forest to cinders.
But we can’t employ that system of morality in the 21st century anymore. It’s a childish and immature one — it isn’t the mindset of a mature species, but of one that barely knows how to reason and think at all yet. If we use the moral limits of the tribe in a time of scarcity and collapse — all that will happen is war, violence, and self-destruction, which is already upon us, whether in the form of American collapse, or Brexits.
This century, this age of collapse, urgently calls for us to expand our moral horizons to include all of us. That’s the only way we care about the planet, about inequality, about greed, about everything going wrong — by caring about everyone on it. Too often, being children of the 20th century, we want to have our cake and eat it too. We want to call ourselves good and moral people — but not really care about anyone outside the family, tribe, or nation. That mistake will not work anymore. In this century, if we cannot care for everyone — no one will be cared for. We will stand together, or we will perish apart.
Think about what it says about us a species that mostly, we don’t care for our young. That is, each of individually might care about our own kids — but do we care about some poor kid in Vietnam or Chile? Of course not. It’s every man for himself, in our small and limited 20th century minds — which are really just Stone Age minds, because in that respect, human morality hasn’t evolved one iota.
So if we are really going to survive and prosper in the 21st century, we are going to have radically reimagine our morality, too. I’m sure this sounds like science fiction to you, so let me put it a little more bluntly.
I’m sure you don’t want billionaires (you’re a sensible person, my friend.) But how do you not have them? You don’t have them by making sure every kid is fed, educated, and nourished first, mentally, emotionally, psychologically, physically. Every kid on planet earth.
But that’s just the beginning. You make sure every river runs clean and pure. You make sure the ocean sings sweet songs of longing, like it should instead of clattering with the sound of plastic and tin cans. You make sure every drop of rain that falls is as pure as it was a million years ago, when there were no humans at all. And so on.
You make sure there are no billionaires by having societies that do things that matter more, first, always, period. And those societies aren’t just limited to “me and mine”, aka these things we call “nations.” If we can’t look out for the human species in the 21st century — all of it — then the inevitable result will be a terrifying plunge into war and chaos that will the 20th century seem tame by comparison. Please go ahead and think about that last sentence carefully — because it seems to me that we don’t understand this principle at all as a world yet.
Three transitions, transformations. Radical changes. Economic, political, and moral. This century feels turbulent — but the truth is that we haven’t yet begun to change. We are just feeling the little warning tremors of the true earthquakes to come. Humanity is going to have to change more in this century than every before — or fall faster, further, than ever before. The reward will be sweet, though — at least for those who can make it. A higher place of consciousness. Happier, wiser, gentler worlds to live in.
Not every country will make it — I wouldn’t bet on America or Britain. But some will. Canada, probably — much of Europe. Societies and people with the courage, curiousity, and perseverance to understand the message the 21st century is trying to desperately send us. If it feels like there aren’t many of those left — what are you waiting for?

Friday 1 March 2019

Part II How to talk to Children and Youth and the Climate Cri





Part II How to talk to Children and Youth and the Climate Crises


Last week I began to present ways that you could talk to children and youth about climate change and other environmental catastrophes of our own making. As promised, I spoked with a class of kids aged 13-16 that I was teaching chemistry too. As it was chemistry class I began with Greta Thunberg talking about why ACTION NOW was vital, told the kids about how the Swedish chemist Arrhenius calculated the effect of increased CO2 concentrations on the world's temperature over 100 years ago & how the Greenhouse Effect behaved, then we moved onto a study of the water and carbon dioxide molecules, next onto an examination of how the composition of gases in the atmosphere has changed over the past few billion years and how these variations impacted the world's climate and life on it, with a particular focus on mass extinctions. The main point I wanted to make is that this is not 'belief" or "opinion" and that CO2 was CO2 - made-made or volcano-made it was just CO2 and it was a greenhouse gas. After that we did a "field trip" to my electric car parked outside and then chatted about all the choices we could all make to live without fossil fuels. Mostly, I let them take the lead in a discussion where we all sat in a circle to allow them to just talk, to let them take make all I had shown them real and part of their lives. This led us to discussions about Lyme disease, flood homes, vegetarianism, and the surprisingly about the fact that most of them had learned the most about climate change from chat groups of students their own age where is was a relatively common topic of discussion. Now, I am not saying that this is normal, but it was still interesting. Surprisingly, there was a positive mood in the class, one, of course, that I had worked hard to nurture by focusing not on the overwhelming nature of the climate challenge, but the fact there are concrete actions we can all take that matter.


Greta Thunberg School Strike March 15 Around the World
It was VERY helpful for the students to listen to Greta Thunberg, a girl their age, yet a girl clearly speaking with emotion and moral authority. She has called for world wide strike by students for March 15 - I hope you can find a local group who will participate!


This is how The Guardian has reported on this coming event:
The students striking from schools around the world to demand action on climate change have issued an uncompromising open letter stating: “We are going to change the fate of humanity, whether you like it or not.” The letter, published by the Guardian, says: “United we will rise on 15 March and many times after until we see climate justice. We demand the world’s decision makers take responsibility and solve this crisis. You have failed us in the past. [But] the youth of this world has started to move and we will not rest again.” The Youth Strikes for Climate movement is not centrally organised, so keeping track of the fast growing number of strikes is difficult, but many are registering on FridaysForFuture.org. So far, there are almost 500 events listed to take place on 15 March across 51 countries, making it the biggest strike day so far. Students plan to skip school across Western Europe, from the US to Brazil and Chile, and from Australia to Iran, India and Japan.

Climate Anxiety is a Mental Health Issue
What amazed me is that the conversations that I had last week confirmed much of the research I have been undertaking for a joint presentation that I am making with my wife, a mental health Nurse, at a mental health conference later this year. Here are one relevant quote to give you a feel for the scope of the issue.
Children are particularly at risk for heightened anxiety and depression from a natural disaster. The American Public Health Association is working hard to study and educate people about the impacts of climate change on mental health. According to this organization, up to 45 percent of children suffer depression after a natural disaster. Some of the behavioral and psychological changes in children include an inability to speak, bed-wetting, stress or fright when not in danger, and self-harm. For children who are just learning about these events, they worry that something bad could also happen to them. They have active imaginations and want to always feel safe. Climate change can instigate feelings of vulnerability and powerlessness that take the shape of anxiety. Surveys indicate that not only is global warming on our children’s minds, it is scaring them. One report found that approximately half of the children surveyed, ages 7 to 11, were anxious about climate change and often lost sleep over it. Another study showed that children ages 11 to 14 were more concerned about climate change than they were about their homework. Wow!


As you can see this is actually a large, mostly new, and highly relevant area that really requires more research and more reading by you, before you make the mistake of traumatizing the children you speak too and create a "deer in headlights" response which stops their ability to constructively respond to the climate challenge. What helps kids is concrete action by YOU! Like Greta, kids cannot understand the hypocrisy of adults who say how "vital it is that we all face the reality of climate change" yet make no significant changes to their lives, and by significant, I mean actions such as becoming a vegetarian, stopping to fly or getting rid of your gasoline powered car. With this in mind here are some links to sites that are focused on how you can best talk to children about the climate crises.
How Climate Change Can Flare Up Your Child’s Anxiety and Depression
Five ways to handle your (or your child’s) “eco-anxiety” 

Good Luck teachers, parents, Aunts and Uncles, Grandmother and Grandfathers ! Having these hard conversations, AFTER you have taken concrete actions to be credible, is one of the greatest gifts that you can give to the children and youth in your life.